So what happens when you vanish in a couple weeks? Or people within your group do? Do you just keep a revolving door of people coming and going to keep this alive? What happens when it turns out the people bringing us here have a different plan for the Displaced and we're whisked away to a different city?
Saying "my way or the highway" can only go so far. If you want to help the people of New Amsterdam you need to get them on board with your plan, not just say "I know best" and hand them your decision. And if you're not willing to compromise on your plan, the only thing you're serving is your own ego.
I intend to have contingencies in place. I've been here a hell of a lot longer than most people, I get how this works.
And I haven't done anything of the sort. I haven't presented my plan, I haven't offered anything up because nothing has been set in stone. But by all means, keep assuming.
You haven't given jack shit for anyone to work with unless they dig through the replies you've given to people who are already in the know, so it's cute that you're getting mad when people make assumptions while trying to play whatever game you're going at right now. I really can't tell if you're trying to discuss a serious idea or if you just want everyone to lay out their personal philosophy for your perusal.
I asked a question to have a discussion. I wanted to know who here wants to make a difference. That's it. There's no hidden motivations. No mind games. Some people already know what I've been planning, that's beside the point of why I asked.
Alright, I tried having a discussion and you immediately got defensive about what I have and haven't assumed, which isn't very conducive to having a discussion. "Just discussing" means you have no stake in the game, but you clearly do since you're already planning something. So it's very unclear what you actually want here.
I have my own goals in mind. Just as I have my own plans to tackle problems I see. Not everyone has to agree with me and I don't have to agree with them, doesn't mean we can't compromise or that other viewpoints can't inform how I proceed.
Should I have added a followup question? An "If so, how?" would that have made this more palatable to you?
Yes, actually. You giving aggressive and defensive replies left and right doesn't demonstrate the intent of being open to critique to the uninformed. It's not like I know you or can read your mind, you have to go through the dance and charade of making it clear what your intent is, otherwise we're going to have misunderstandings like this. It's not about being more palatable, it's about communication.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Saying "my way or the highway" can only go so far. If you want to help the people of New Amsterdam you need to get them on board with your plan, not just say "I know best" and hand them your decision. And if you're not willing to compromise on your plan, the only thing you're serving is your own ego.
no subject
And I haven't done anything of the sort. I haven't presented my plan, I haven't offered anything up because nothing has been set in stone. But by all means, keep assuming.
no subject
no subject
I wanted to know who here wants to make a difference.
That's it.
There's no hidden motivations.
No mind games.
Some people already know what I've been planning, that's beside the point of why I asked.
no subject
no subject
Should I have added a followup question? An "If so, how?" would that have made this more palatable to you?
no subject
no subject
no subject
Look, we're just going in circles now. I've said my piece, you can add it to your list of considerations or not.
I do have a final suggestion: hire a PR manager.
no subject
Someone else will handle the public from now on.