thwipandrelease: (P0340)
PBP ([personal profile] thwipandrelease) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark2019-06-23 11:44 pm

@peter.benjamin

So I know I can't be the only one who's had the unexpected pleasure of coming into possession of messages that aren't intended for my consumption. I'm not talking about you getting someone's private love letters or metaphorical cat video links, which I've gotten and deleted.

If I were back home, I'd be sliding this info to my nearest and dearest investigative journalist type. Since I'm not, well, I guess I've got to take matters in my own hands.

It's an interesting read, so, I'm just going to include the unedited details for all.


[what follows is a copy of the message that peter had received earlier, sent from lydia gill-jade, which seems the sort of thing that would come up in a current headlines search if it weren't presumably a secret. well, so much for that, huh?]

Maybe it's just me, but do people usually name successors for campaign donations?
tishina: (why are you so alarmed?)

[personal profile] tishina 2019-06-29 05:45 am (UTC)(link)
in my experience, keeping low about these sort of issues tends to be the best route to take
at least with the general population
telling a closed group of people who are trying to hide from the eyes of the government is better

even then, i'd still be wary about spreading info till we're certain we know what's going on
to the general population i mean
tishina: (my friends don't seem to care)

[personal profile] tishina 2019-06-29 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
better leave the task of telling the general pop to someone with experience
or someone tasked with the capabilities of making sure none of this comes back on you
or us

going back a bit- if you aren't the investigative type then what type are you?
tishina: (i'm falling through the cracks)

[personal profile] tishina 2019-07-01 01:42 am (UTC)(link)
that's fair. it's ok to feel responsible but not everyone is equipped with the same skills

science huh?