@peter.benjamin

[thwipandrelease]

So I know I can't be the only one who's had the unexpected pleasure of coming into possession of messages that aren't intended for my consumption. I'm not talking about you getting someone's private love letters or metaphorical cat video links, which I've gotten and deleted.

If I were back home, I'd be sliding this info to my nearest and dearest investigative journalist type. Since I'm not, well, I guess I've got to take matters in my own hands.

It's an interesting read, so, I'm just going to include the unedited details for all.

[what follows is a copy of the message that peter had received earlier, sent from lydia gill-jade, which seems the sort of thing that would come up in a current headlines search if it weren't presumably a secret. well, so much for that, huh?]

Maybe it's just me, but do people usually name successors for campaign donations?

Comments

[stabilis]

[ cool cool cool cool ]

I'm with Rey on this one. ALIGN sounds like a cute acronym for "do what we tell you to".

This is good, though. Tech has vulnerabilities, and we already know this programming has internal issues and doesn't hold up well to EMPs. Does make me wonder how thorough the UNA consent form is and whether these people know what they're signing up for.

[998]

If this isn't how they're controlling them, it's likely part of it.

Perhaps you and the other engineers could take a look at the soldier in our custody and see if you can find any other vulnerabilities.