@peter.benjamin

[thwipandrelease]

So I know I can't be the only one who's had the unexpected pleasure of coming into possession of messages that aren't intended for my consumption. I'm not talking about you getting someone's private love letters or metaphorical cat video links, which I've gotten and deleted.

If I were back home, I'd be sliding this info to my nearest and dearest investigative journalist type. Since I'm not, well, I guess I've got to take matters in my own hands.

It's an interesting read, so, I'm just going to include the unedited details for all.

[what follows is a copy of the message that peter had received earlier, sent from lydia gill-jade, which seems the sort of thing that would come up in a current headlines search if it weren't presumably a secret. well, so much for that, huh?]

Maybe it's just me, but do people usually name successors for campaign donations?

Comments

@yalena.yardeen

[motivation]

only in this one?

[evasives]

Fair point.

In any government. Usually they just try to hide it a little better.

[motivation]

looks like this one was trying to hide it, too

[evasives]

That is not surprising. Most do.

It just makes me curious what else we could find.

[motivation]

what're the odds of more incriminating fun bits?

[evasives]

If this keeps up, hopefully quite high. Those are the parts I am sure we would all be more interested in.

But even what we have could give us direction.