motivation: (【 THIRTY-SIX 】)
DUTCH。 ([personal profile] motivation) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark2019-02-17 08:45 pm

@yalena.yardeen

here's what i don't get

someone leaked the names and locations of those agents. that i get, people are corruptible. might be a problem for us at some point, if it's still a thing, but it's not weird.

what is weird is that the soldiers didn't knock on gaby's door and didn't plan for us at all. seems like a pretty big tactical fuck-up to me, unless they didn't know about our existence, but again. leak.

so, anyone got an explanation for that? hells, i'd take guesses, too.


( ooc » feel free to use this as a discussion post for the event wrap up, if so inclined! )
cheffeur: (30)

[personal profile] cheffeur 2019-02-26 04:13 pm (UTC)(link)
[It's one of those moments when he has to remember that Morningstar is an organization of its own agenda. And while those here have been entwined with them, they're certainly not all one cohesive unit-- evidenced clearly by those actually involved with the organization having some very helpful information, and only just now sharing it.]

'We' being Morningstar and its affiliates, I presume.

Then I suppose there's a pattern involving the recruitment times, since you're sure that the information they received was older. Has anyone begun to fix a timeframe based on the cut-off of those targeted by the UNA and those left alone?
cheffeur: (Toasty Rice Balls)

[personal profile] cheffeur 2019-03-04 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Perhaps I'll be able to make time and visit the safehouse, then, if she's keen on divulging.

That would be the best start, if you wished to confirm the theories of the date of information. Out of all of those who were targeted, when did they join, and where is the break between those targeted and those ignored. Clearly in that break the data would be obtained.