retravel: (168)
oh, fitz. ([personal profile] retravel) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark 2019-06-11 08:09 am (UTC)

Then we can work with you.
Would you be willing to join a research phase and attempt to both identify weapons and spy any defects?
I'm not sure we'll be able to fully secure an area, but should any tech pass on to the field test phase, we do need comparatively safe sites scouted. The more keen eyes on this the better. And we'll most definitely need contain procedures and protocol drills for all teams, so please do let me know your thoughts.

At present, I'm inclined to bring defensive and evasive powers in for both the research and testing stages. After talking with Miller, we're currently looking at trios of a firearms operator, a defensive or evasive ability, and a researcher or observer for the testing phase. Do you think that would suit?

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of meadowlark.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting