vns: (Sept)
『g』『a』『b』『y』 ([personal profile] vns) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark2019-01-10 10:23 am

@gaby

[ this was supposed to be one of Gaby's days off. in fact, she's not in the safehouse when the message comes in. ]

Turns out that we're missing two new faces around the safehouse.

I'd play a guessing game as to why I wasn't told, but I don't care. These two faces apparently murdered two people that night.

I don't know who they are, but I do know that they're locked up. Any guesses as to what's going to happen to them?

Genuine question. Because I don't know.

Oh, and because some of you think you can do whatever the hell you want around here: don't think the way out for them is a jail break. Don't even fucking try it. And no, Morningstar isn't in the business of breaking people out of jail, because that would be stupid.


[ she's a little angry. no. a lot. but mostly she doesn't know how to handle this one. ]

Look. You know something? Tell me. You won't be "in trouble."
rehandle: (284)

[personal profile] rehandle 2019-01-11 11:22 am (UTC)(link)
Even if you did, the police have a lot of technology at their disposal here. And given how high profile some of our escapades have been, finding links between those of us who are already here may not be that difficult. One of us shows up at the exact precinct where two anomalies are being held? It might at least warrant some looking into.

[ that, and he's already asked. and the reason why not has nothing to do with any of these technicalities, but it helps that they're valid.

not that Katelin seems to need the elaboration, but everyone's chiming in on everything in this shitshow. somebody else coming fresh to this discussion might read this and simmer down for five minutes. ]
covertness: (⟫ back)

[personal profile] covertness 2019-01-12 02:19 pm (UTC)(link)
not worth the risk for what it might get us, got it
what ways of getting more information do we have?
rehandle: (pic#12484580)

[personal profile] rehandle 2019-01-12 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know, not really my area. But I trust that Morningstar are more capable of gathering this information than we are at present.
covertness: (⟫ athleisure)

[personal profile] covertness 2019-01-13 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)
they definitely have more experience
but if there's some of us with powers that could be useful, i think we shouldn't disregard that
rehandle: (pic#12290378)

[personal profile] rehandle 2019-01-14 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree, provided their use isn't going to jeopardise our position.
covertness: (⟫ 020)

[personal profile] covertness 2019-01-14 08:33 pm (UTC)(link)
i don't want that any more than you do
rehandle: (Default)

[personal profile] rehandle 2019-01-14 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Glad to hear it.