『g』『a』『b』『y』 (
vns) wrote in
meadowlark2019-01-10 10:23 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
@gaby
[ this was supposed to be one of Gaby's days off. in fact, she's not in the safehouse when the message comes in. ]
Turns out that we're missing two new faces around the safehouse.
I'd play a guessing game as to why I wasn't told, but I don't care. These two faces apparently murdered two people that night.
I don't know who they are, but I do know that they're locked up. Any guesses as to what's going to happen to them?
Genuine question. Because I don't know.
Oh, and because some of you think you can do whatever the hell you want around here: don't think the way out for them is a jail break. Don't even fucking try it. And no, Morningstar isn't in the business of breaking people out of jail, because that would be stupid.
[ she's a little angry. no. a lot. but mostly she doesn't know how to handle this one. ]
Look. You know something? Tell me. You won't be "in trouble."
Turns out that we're missing two new faces around the safehouse.
I'd play a guessing game as to why I wasn't told, but I don't care. These two faces apparently murdered two people that night.
I don't know who they are, but I do know that they're locked up. Any guesses as to what's going to happen to them?
Genuine question. Because I don't know.
Oh, and because some of you think you can do whatever the hell you want around here: don't think the way out for them is a jail break. Don't even fucking try it. And no, Morningstar isn't in the business of breaking people out of jail, because that would be stupid.
[ she's a little angry. no. a lot. but mostly she doesn't know how to handle this one. ]
Look. You know something? Tell me. You won't be "in trouble."
no subject
no subject
So, what about your powers?
no subject
My powers are under control.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Look.
This is going to end up on the media. If they didn't get to the safe house then they won't have an identity. That will end up all over their news, probably with their faces and a call for people to identify them.
You may be able to spin it as something else. They're some escaped mental patients or someone ripped out their implants and caused brain damage in the process, that's why they killed.
This is again assuming they aren't going to slaughter everyone they're in close quarters with.
You may have to prepare for more than just some freaks with some glow in the dark paint to know we exist.
no subject
Do you ever stop to consider that the person you're speaking to may actually know more than you do?
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
So. That's a no.
Don't talk like you're above me. In terms of humanity. You're not.
no subject
You have no right to question my humanity.
(no subject)
no subject
@leo.fitz
no subject
no subject
When the nurse was killed, we became more suspicious, didn't we?
The same would be true for your apparent targets.
no subject
They're a liability as they currently stand.
Sometimes you have to cut your losses.
private.
So if offing them would solve our problems, know that I would be with you, Hafid.
But right now, I think there are others who will reach them first, and that we should let them.
[ MS, to an extent, and the people who held them in the first place. why not let the murderers be bait, so they can see how far both organisations will go for them? ]
private.
private forever.
private forever.
flies into your inbox.
no subject
no subject
The way I see it, we're a valuable asset to them. How the hell else are they going to defeat monsters and deal with what the enemy throws at them?
Don't be naive.
no subject
no subject
But whatever, fine.
Let them slaughter each other and expose the whole operation.
If it's not her problem, it's not my problem.
I've got better things to do than to keep criminals alive anyway.
no subject
no subject