vns: (Sept)
『g』『a』『b』『y』 ([personal profile] vns) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark2019-01-10 10:23 am

@gaby

[ this was supposed to be one of Gaby's days off. in fact, she's not in the safehouse when the message comes in. ]

Turns out that we're missing two new faces around the safehouse.

I'd play a guessing game as to why I wasn't told, but I don't care. These two faces apparently murdered two people that night.

I don't know who they are, but I do know that they're locked up. Any guesses as to what's going to happen to them?

Genuine question. Because I don't know.

Oh, and because some of you think you can do whatever the hell you want around here: don't think the way out for them is a jail break. Don't even fucking try it. And no, Morningstar isn't in the business of breaking people out of jail, because that would be stupid.


[ she's a little angry. no. a lot. but mostly she doesn't know how to handle this one. ]

Look. You know something? Tell me. You won't be "in trouble."
batricide: (temp-temp_0027_000495)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 08:36 pm (UTC)(link)
A murderer's hands are the wrong hands. That's barely even a question worth asking.
batricide: (temp-temp_0020_000488)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Killing a dangerous person isn't the same thing as killing an innocent one.
My powers are under control.
batricide: (Taking my sulking to the masses)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
It's a stupid point not worth acknowledging.
batricide: (000425)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
[ he hates you gabby. so so much. ]

Look.
This is going to end up on the media. If they didn't get to the safe house then they won't have an identity. That will end up all over their news, probably with their faces and a call for people to identify them.
You may be able to spin it as something else. They're some escaped mental patients or someone ripped out their implants and caused brain damage in the process, that's why they killed.
This is again assuming they aren't going to slaughter everyone they're in close quarters with.
You may have to prepare for more than just some freaks with some glow in the dark paint to know we exist.
batricide: (Default)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Considering you said you don't know? No.
batricide: (000462)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah? Connect me to your supervisor, I swear I'll give them my full attention.
batricide: (temp-temp_0022_000490)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-11 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
[ This is a bad idea. This is a bad situation. There was a point to disengage but that was a long time ago. ]

You have no right to question my humanity.

[personal profile] deicider 2019-01-10 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Gaby doesn't have to prepare for anything. We're not Morningstar's problem, they're helping us for free. Whether killing them is the right thing to do is a moot point. We don't have the resources to pull off a double murder, not even a single.
retravel: (087)

@leo.fitz

[personal profile] retravel 2019-01-10 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Agreed on all counts.
batricide: (000173)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought you were smarter than that.
retravel: (083)

[personal profile] retravel 2019-01-10 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm smart enough to know when a murder's likely to draw more attention, not less.
When the nurse was killed, we became more suspicious, didn't we?
The same would be true for your apparent targets.
batricide: (000420)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
They aren't my targets.
They're a liability as they currently stand.
Sometimes you have to cut your losses.
retravel: (071)

private.

[personal profile] retravel 2019-01-10 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right. They are liabilities. And you're right again, you cut your losses. You protect the many, not the few. That's only mathematics.
So if offing them would solve our problems, know that I would be with you, Hafid.
But right now, I think there are others who will reach them first, and that we should let them.


[ MS, to an extent, and the people who held them in the first place. why not let the murderers be bait, so they can see how far both organisations will go for them? ]
Edited (nitpicks!!) 2019-01-10 23:26 (UTC)

private.

[personal profile] batricide - 2019-01-10 23:46 (UTC) - Expand

private forever.

[personal profile] retravel - 2019-01-11 00:05 (UTC) - Expand

private forever.

[personal profile] batricide - 2019-01-11 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

flies into your inbox.

[personal profile] retravel - 2019-01-11 00:19 (UTC) - Expand
batricide: (000004)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Free? Ha.
The way I see it, we're a valuable asset to them. How the hell else are they going to defeat monsters and deal with what the enemy throws at them?
Don't be naive.

[personal profile] deicider 2019-01-10 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I promise you, Morningstar didn't tell us to go fight the kaiju, that was all our idea. We're an asset but we're also a huge risk. There's a world outside of New Amsterdam, and bigger, more complicated problems for them to deal with than a giant monster.
batricide: (Default)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
We're a resource in their insurgency. Liability or not we offer something no one else can.
But whatever, fine.
Let them slaughter each other and expose the whole operation.
If it's not her problem, it's not my problem.
I've got better things to do than to keep criminals alive anyway.

[personal profile] deicider 2019-01-10 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Maybe if we ever get our crap together we can be a resource, but that's obviously a ways off.
batricide: (Default)

[personal profile] batricide 2019-01-10 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Might be easier if we had actual leadership.