strongarmed: i've been following the tasks. (13126787)
north. ([personal profile] strongarmed) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark 2019-06-17 08:35 pm (UTC)

[That is... a lot of information. Thorough and organized.]

Lucky for you.

I don't see the logic behind a dummy cache either. I also don't see why some of the weapons would be useless while others are fully functioning. What's the point? Make it harder to test, hope some backfire and kill us in the event of theft? If they didn't plant the cache there to be picked up in a raid on purpose, then you're guessing the traps are designed and set just in case. Right? So the UNA has a way of identifying a worthless or compromised item from one that can actually be used as intended, and it's likely they're all trained on the difference. Might be a lot easier to get that information from one of them instead of trying out every single weapon. But maybe you can't. Maybe all you've got is this big box of unfamiliar tech and a line of eager volunteers.


[No other resources, she's assuming. Not the Morningstar that used to exist. They've suffered a blow before she ever got here.]

If the contents get split to two locations, does everyone get access to those coordinates? Are you advocating it because you want to control who gets what, to keep something dangerous out of the wrong hands? That means we'll have to just trust whoever's calling the shots. Is that going to be you?

I'll keep an eye out for that debate.


[Since it'll be some time before it happens if they're starting with these tests.]

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of meadowlark.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting