retravel: (086)
oh, fitz. ([personal profile] retravel) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark 2019-06-11 06:25 am (UTC)

Oh, the only thing I’m sure of is that it has explosive potential. In fact, we’ll be operating under the assumption that every item is a trap, intentionally designed to damage us.

[ nothing accidental about it. ]

However, we’ll tailor our approach once we’ve examined each item, rather than assuming all should be handled, dismantled, or tested. Categorise everything on a threat scale of green to red. Red for unknowns, single-use items, anything that looks to be tampered with, defective, or rigged to backfire.

Some will need to be boxed and locked up. Nothing more.


[ assume and prepare for the worst. hope for the best.

another vigilante, huh. rather popular career these days. ]


I see. We have a similar team back home.
Have you handled military-grade weapons before?


[ gauging everyone’s familiarity with similar tech to see if they’re likely to notice something awry. ]

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of meadowlark.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting