No, it won't. I've had people like that in my world, too. There's an understanding blood must have blood among a large group of people. Being brought here could be a way of ripping them away from their duties and life, and anyone not allowing them freedom could be worthy of that kind of response.
But this world is also a difficult one in which to commit murder. In a few days, someone like that can learn the degree of surveillance in this world, as well as the danger of doing it. They can learn that death is less permanent, and thus the act of doing it might not be worth it. It's one thing to want to harm someone, it's another thing to get away with it. Violence isn't as welcomed in this world, despite all that we've been through. It's possible that might change, but this is a world without wars, and the only dividing lines are between Morningstar and the government/corporations and, more recently, us and the government.
It's possible that the knowledge wouldn't help them. Wouldn't make them exercise caution. It's possible that they'd kill everyone around them in the safehouse and need to be put down. But you can't argue that you could control a situation like that more by letting someone loose than keeping them shut down in a smaller space. You limit the variant factors.
Mind you, this is an extreme situation. It hasn't happened yet. But if we're looking to minimize risk, we probably don't want to add more variables rather than less.
no subject
But this world is also a difficult one in which to commit murder. In a few days, someone like that can learn the degree of surveillance in this world, as well as the danger of doing it. They can learn that death is less permanent, and thus the act of doing it might not be worth it. It's one thing to want to harm someone, it's another thing to get away with it. Violence isn't as welcomed in this world, despite all that we've been through. It's possible that might change, but this is a world without wars, and the only dividing lines are between Morningstar and the government/corporations and, more recently, us and the government.
It's possible that the knowledge wouldn't help them. Wouldn't make them exercise caution. It's possible that they'd kill everyone around them in the safehouse and need to be put down. But you can't argue that you could control a situation like that more by letting someone loose than keeping them shut down in a smaller space. You limit the variant factors.
Mind you, this is an extreme situation. It hasn't happened yet. But if we're looking to minimize risk, we probably don't want to add more variables rather than less.