You, me, Markus, possibly his family. And that would seem evident, yes.
[ but if optics are a problem, and he'll very much agree that they are - ]
Though if we're to start involving the word debate, we'll need to diversify access to the conversation. I was hopeful this time, but I think it's become clear that the network as an exclusive venue for these conversations isn't having the desired effect. Arguments that muddy the waters immortalized for any fresh eyes to see when they look back to find actual information on big issues has hurt us before and will most likely continue to inspire mistrust.
We have a habit of desperately derailing. Manageable in person, relatively damning over text.
no subject
[ but if optics are a problem, and he'll very much agree that they are - ]
Though if we're to start involving the word debate, we'll need to diversify access to the conversation. I was hopeful this time, but I think it's become clear that the network as an exclusive venue for these conversations isn't having the desired effect. Arguments that muddy the waters immortalized for any fresh eyes to see when they look back to find actual information on big issues has hurt us before and will most likely continue to inspire mistrust.
We have a habit of desperately derailing. Manageable in person, relatively damning over text.
[ example 1: this mess
example 2: murdergate ]