retravel: (147)
oh, fitz. ([personal profile] retravel) wrote in [community profile] meadowlark 2019-02-10 11:41 am (UTC)

@leo.fitz

Thanks for the ping.
And thank you for sharing these details, Keith. They're extremely helpful.


[ he saw the lad on day one, and he's quite right, the hair has changed, and combined with all the other information, the appearances and disappearances, his own research into natural and unnatural activity in the last year, that means — ]

I'm with you both on this. Our flickering in and out of different timelines doesn't read as intentional. Everything about "the group" who held us for a time points to an orderly modus operandi, at odds with this randomness. Systematic, streamlined dropoffs during times of peak traffic. Agents who step out of line being swiftly terminated.

There's an element of unintentionality in this, even if we've been used with intent after the fact. Does that track?


[ he has a clearer theory than ever, but he wants to be sure this makes sense, that Strange agrees with him to an extent, before he puts the rest out here. ]

Post a comment in response:

This community only allows commenting by members. You may comment here if you're a member of meadowlark.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting