Sorry to press the point, but I want to make sure we're both coming at this from the same angle. In my understanding, we're proposing a separation from Morningstar. Not total, but enough that we're no longer a significant drain on their resources or as big a risk to their safety. We will no longer be held in a Morningstar facility. Consequently, our decision-making processes will largely be our own.
How do we as a community of individuals protect that community? How do we ensure that we maintain the necessary levels of secrecy and security without the implementation of any kind of system in the absence of authority? The holding period is necessary. If this incident has taught us nothing, it's taught us that. IDs are imperative, we can't risk being discovered without them.
I really would like to understand what you consider to be the alternative. I mean that. At present I just can't see what else we can do but create our own process that emulates what we we already know works, while taking into consideration the differences that come along with going it alone.
no subject
How do we as a community of individuals protect that community? How do we ensure that we maintain the necessary levels of secrecy and security without the implementation of any kind of system in the absence of authority? The holding period is necessary. If this incident has taught us nothing, it's taught us that. IDs are imperative, we can't risk being discovered without them.
I really would like to understand what you consider to be the alternative. I mean that. At present I just can't see what else we can do but create our own process that emulates what we we already know works, while taking into consideration the differences that come along with going it alone.